RNR vs. ^SP500TR

In the year-to-date period, RNR achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly lower than ^SP500TR's -0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, RNR has underperformed ^SP500TR with an annualized return of 9.64%, while ^SP500TR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.63% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) and S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RNR Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the ^SP500TR Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNR and ^SP500TR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum RNR drawdown since its inception was -45.67%, smaller than the maximum ^SP500TR drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNR and ^SP500TR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to S&P 500 Total Return (^SP500TR) at 4.58%. This indicates that RNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^SP500TR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.